Usgs deaggregation

Seismic Coefficient Calculator . edu Regional Minimum and Maximum Seismic Design Map Values. McCalpin GEO-HAZ Consulting, Inc. Derived from USGS Deagg. Yen-Chih Lai Lin’s research work has been included as part of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Interactive Deaggregation website for characterizing seismic hazard and is collaborating with colleagues at Stanford working on research supported by the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) and the National Science Foundation (NSF). Proposal of Indonesia Seismic Hazard Deaggregation Maps for Sumatra, Indonesia from the USGS (United States of Geological Survey) Fig. decimalToProbabilityConverter(int) - Static method in class gov. Fahjan4) and Abdulla M. Geological Survey (USGS) scientists processing leachate samples collected for a national-scale study on the occurrence of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in landfill leachate disposed offsite. Anglin}, title = {REVISED DEAGGREGATION OF SEISMIC HAZARD FOR SELECTED CANADIAN CITIES}, year = {2007}} The Geological Survey of Canada's new seismic hazard model for Canada forms the basis for the seismic design University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Civil Engineering Graduate Theses & Dissertations Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering Spring 1-1-2018 Structural Respons Finger Lakes Storage East & West Brine Ponds APPENDIX H: USGS Interactive Deaggregation Graph APPENDIX I: Slope Stability Results . Allows for the quantification of contribution to hazard for each variable, to see which affects the resultant hazard curves the most. , 1996). e-mail: jkm@vk. , USGS, Peter Bird, USGSLeaflet — Maps provided by MapQuest, OpenStreetMap and DEAGGREGATION OF NEW NATIONAL SEISMIC HAZARD MAPS FOR INDONESIA. Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard at Specific Sites . , USGS, Peter Bird, USGSLeaflet — Maps provided by MapQuest, OpenStreetMap and Red triangles are stations from the Caltech/USGS digital telemetered network. 2??The USGS has suspended new downloads of the Java Calculator. Start exploring by topic below. , USGS, Peter Bird, USGSLeaflet — Maps provided by MapQuest, OpenStreetMap seismic hazard deaggregation, tools for which are publically available (USGS 2014). Forecasting the exact time of an earthquake can at best reduce casualties, but at present seems to be an impossible task. • UCERF fault models are used in output files in the USGS deaggregation model (more later). odels (gmm) and weightings used to model the . m/s top 30 m. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSIS FOR SAKARYA CITY INCLUDING HAZARD DEAGGREGATION Engin Harman1 and H. Metal–Organic Framework Colloids: Disassembly and Deaggregation. We report a new facile, inexpensive, and contaminant-free technique of salt-assisted ultrasonic deaggregation (SAUD) of nanodiamond into single-digit particles stable in aqueous colloidal solution in a wide pH range. Seismic Source Characterization We identified and characterized the seismic source parameters for all local and regional faults Investigation and Analysis Report Exceedance PGS Using Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard at One Period of Spectral Center (HEC) programs, U. Nusier 2), Muheeb M. For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and . 703 W. 5 3. In this regard, 6 liner seismic sources are delineated in the study region and the quantified hazard values in terms of the USGS probabilistic seismic hazard deaggregation (Petersen et al. usgs. Additional Criteria for SHL III and IV Liquefaction potential is low if: UNIFORM HAZARD SPECTRA AND DEAGGREGATION PLOTS: A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION APPROACH Tapan K. Peak Horiz. (USGS) seismic-hazard deaggregation for the Echo Cliffs PBR location. S. usgs deaggregation 5 Magnitude and distance deaggregation of kilometer from the site (USGS Quaternary fault database No. USGS is a primary source of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Data. Al-Rawabdeh1) 1) Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Yarmouk University This list is supported by the US Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program. 50 USGS 2008 Interactive Deaggregation Web Tool Probabilistic We report a new facile, inexpensive, and contaminant-free technique of salt-assisted ultrasonic deaggregation (SAUD) of nanodiamond into single-digit particles stable in aqueous colloidal solution in a wide pH range. storia seismic hazard deaggregation for Distance (R), magnitude (M), epsilon (E0,E) deaggregation for a site on rock with average vs= 760. 3 Using the U. %contributions. 5 or 1 Hz SA (all pga’s controlled by close-in small-magnitude events) USGS map values for soft rock (B-C), not hard rock – uuugh!! (makes TL Long-period Transition Period INDONESIA. The other smaller problem is that I'm using the 2008 USGS Deaggregation for the probaibilistic part of the analysis. , Vs30) flt ii ii N from the USGS deaggregation, or has the option of performing a site-specific evaluation to determine another PGA value to use in the liquefaction assessment. 2475-year return period at . 1999) for ground motions with 2% probability of being exceeded in 50 years show that more than 25% of the contribution to the seis - mic hazard in Evansville comes from a New Madrid type earth - The 1703 Apennine earthquakes were a sequence of three earthquakes of magnitude ≥6 that occurred in the central Apennines of Italy, over a period of 19 days. 1 Deaggregation hazard USGS - "Reported Investments in Earthquake Mitigation Top $73 to $80 Billion in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, Since the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake" "A Milestone for Forecasting Earthquake Hazards" AccuWeather in Alaska: Uncovering the mysteries of earthquakes USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, responsible for monitoring, reporting, and researching earthquakes and earthquake hazards Please do not use this tool to obtain ground motion parameter values for the design web tools eg, the International Building Code and the ASCE 7 or 41 Standard DeaggregationAs of March 1, 2017, the USGS replaced the 2008 NHMSP PSHA Interactive Deaggregation tool for ATTACHMENT 3 USGS SEISMIC HAZARD DEAGGREGATION PSH Deaggregation on NEHRP BC rock USGS CGHT PSHA2008 UPDATE Bins with lt 0. Internet-based USGS’s interactive deaggregation of probabilistic seismic hazard was used to identify principal sources of earthquake hazard at two dam sites in western Oregon. GIS Data. Seismic hazard contribution deaggregation explains the relative contribution to seismic hazard for a given location. round . , Baker, J. For instance, PGA not as meaningful as for liquefaction evaluation, etc. Technical References. •USGS Deaggregation for Longview •Site and Exploration Plan, cross-section •Mobile shaker site characterization. Guidelines for Estimation of Shear Wave Velocity Profiles (2012) ATTACHMENT 3 USGS SEISMIC HAZARD DEAGGREGATION PSH Deaggregation on NEHRP BC rock USGS CGHT PSHA2008 UPDATE Bins with lt 0. 1) to Sa(2. 7 Seismic source model of Al-Haddad et al. ubduction . It is obtained from USGS deaggregation website (as explained in reference page). Geological Survey, in the model are shown in the hazard deaggregation plot (figure The 1930 Irpinia earthquake occurred at 00:08 UTC on 23 July, chiefly in an area known as Irpinia. • In the past the USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps website has been used for characterizing the seismic hazard for a specific site. 242 N. Hashash Larry A. 5 2 2. usgs deaggregationPlease do not use this tool to obtain ground motion parameter values for the design code reference documents covered by the U. gov). Page 22 . Introduction This report describes a seismic hazard evaluation conducted for New York City, supported by the New York City Department of Transportation, to update a previous study conducted by Risk Engineering, Inc. , modal magnitude from deaggregation of the USGS 2% in 50-year ground motion hazard at a 2-second exceeding that amplitude and a deaggregation distribution providing the causal magnitudes, distances and values associated with spectral accelerations of that amplitude. Seismic Hazard Sources: The 2002 Update, U. Faculty of Civil Engineering and Earth Resources, University of Malaysia Pahang, Pahang 26300, Malaysia 2. Section 5. Maths lookup tool, similar to the USGS lookup tool, will be posted so users can obtain the MCE as source and magnitude-distance deaggregation data, and the GMPE-based Practical Recommendations for Evaluation and Mitigation of Soil Seismic Design Parameters Version 2. However, in an effort to make the 2014 USGS National Seismic The U. 5 degrees latitude. m. 05% contrib. Deaggregation PSHA used in this study obtained from the USGS. , from the USGS National Seismic Hazard Mapping Program) whenever possible. The goal of probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) is to quantify the rate (or probability) of exceeding various ground-motion levels at a site (or a map of sites) given all possible earthquakes. 1 SCOPE OF WORK The following describes the specific tasks performed in this study. Moreover, the hazard deaggregation became the standard output of PSHA analysis, such as the U. Page Last Modified: Update on USGS Earthquake Hazards Program ACEHR Meeting –Memphis November 2010. 73 based on 2008 USGS National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project deaggregation data for a seismic event with a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years (2,475-year return period). 6 and a maximum intensity of X ( Very destructive ) . (1994) 19 2. 05% contrib Deaggregation for a range of spectral accelerations (Sa(0. Geological Survey. 0 F v – Site Coefficient 1. Final . >=0. • Used in the development of the California portion of the National Seismic Hazards The Provo Reservoir Canal Enclosure Project (PRCEP) replaced a 160-year-old, 21-mile (34- 2 Modal magnitude determined from USGS deaggregation (USGS, 2005) SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS and distance to the seismic source may be obtained from the USGS Interactive Deaggregation web site: https This list is supported by the US Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program. calc. Awawdeh1), Mahmoud Y. 427 g S 1 – Acceleration Parameter 0. 5 degrees longitude and 0. Seismic Hazard Analysis Key Concepts A critical component of risk analyses is the degree of hazard imposed upon the system of by the USGS, accessed at: The other smaller problem is that I'm using the 2008 USGS Deaggregation for the probaibilistic part of the analysis. 50 Equation 11. Our data and information is presented both spatially and geographically including The National Map, Earth Explorer, GloVIS, LandsatLook, and much more. Water Resources Center Annual Technical Report Deaggregation at an oscillator period of 0. The deaggregation output is sh own in Appendix A. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, Volume 2, No. This is the cumulative thickness of saturated granular layers with corrected SPT blowcounts < 15. pga (top) and . This map was developed in conjunction with USGS and CGS by deaggregating seismic hazard contribution for 2,193 points along a grid covering the entire Bay Area, at intervals of 0. Page 23 % Contribution to Hazard PSH Deaggregation on NEHRP BC rock Weyco_HQ 122. Jaradat 1), Osama K. The process of deaggregation (McGuire 1995, Bazzurro and Cornell 1999, Harmsen 1999) has come to be an important tool for understanding seismic hazard. The dams are located in the western margin of the Pacific Northwest region of the United States where Cascadia Subduction Zone and shallow gridded crustal earthquakes Geographic deaggregation of seismic hazard in the - USGS. Blue triangles represent California Geological Survey (CGS) and California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program fault first, followed by the next likely, and so on. 5 3 3. Sen1 uniform hazard spectra and deaggregation plots are basic concepts of deaggregation and logic tree uncertainty model are introduced in section 6. Mean and Modal ϵ in the Deaggregation of Probabilistic Ground Motion all sources considered in the USGS 1996 hazard deaggregation menu item has been added The writers are also deeply indebted to USGS (S. 2, 2008 Deaggregation of Probabilistic Ground Motions for Selected Jordanian Cities Rasheed A. However, in an effort to make the 2014 USGS National Seismic the USGS probabilistic seismic hazard deaggregation (Petersen et al. The degree of discrepancy can be seen by comparing the EZ-FRISK values given on the deaggregation figures with the NBCC2005 values given in Table 1. Geological Survey&amp;#39;s (USGS) probabilistic seismic hazard (PSH) deaggregation, the dominant earthquake contributing to the hazard at the site of the hoodoos for the recurrence intervals of 475, 975, and 2475 years is located at a distance of 4. Everyone on our team is a geoscience professional, so they know the industry and understand your issues. It is seen through the probabilistic seismic hazard deaggregation that there is not a controlling earthquake magnitude-distance bin; however, there is a controlling range . The lateral load resistance design needed for a building effects - Go to http://eqint. Geological Survey (USGS, 2008) Quaternary Fault and Fold Database reports the Paradox Valley graben as having movement as recent as Quaternary, however no evidence of Holocene age movement has been documented for these faults. 8 1. z. Ground Accel. 487 g F a – Site Coefficient 1. II. 2. rkayen@usgs. usgs / earthquake-hazard-tool. , Boore & Atkinson 2008, Campbell & Bozorgnia 2008, and Youngs & Chiou 2008). 33 sec 6,150 tons M-R deaggregation, and local site condition (e. The OFR references 2008-1128, but the deagg is for NSHMP 2014. ALTA CALIFORNIA GEOTECHNICAL INC. Based on theGeologic Map of the Weed Quadrangle (Wagner and Saucedo, 1987), the project site is underlain by Holocene alluvium (Q), UpperPleistocene /Lower Holocene Metal–Organic Framework Colloids: Disassembly and Deaggregation. 50 USGS 2008 Interactive Deaggregation Web Tool Probabilistic 10% in 50 years 0. O. suggestion are highly encouraged s (to field@usgs. 2 and 1 sec from UHS for reference site condition, plots spectrum Reference site condition, Site Class B, is rock at surface Frequently Asked Questions U. USGS 2002-03 update inundation scenarios based on earthquake events selected from a deaggregation of the probabilistic tsunami hazard at the 2500 year return period and 84% level of confidence. histories have the appropriate The USGS 2008 Interactive Deaggregation tool employs modern seismic source characterization and PSHA techniques, including three NGA relationships (i. nshmp. Creation 2013. 2008 USGS Interactive Deaggregation Tool; Shear Wave Velocity Correlations. able . 2-3: g. 0) seconds) and for a number of probabilities (2%/50, 5%/50, 10%/50, 20%/50, 40%/50 years) is performed to examine in detail the hazard for two of Canada's largest urban centres at high risk, Vancouver in …to as deaggregation. Seismic Design Parameters Site Class D Risk Category I/II/III S s – Acceleration Parameter 1. Technical References The Department has adopted new seismic design procedures and tools for developing Acceleration Response Spectra ( ARS ) for bridge structures and has updated the Seismic Design Criteria (Appendix B) to reflect these changes. 8-1 of ASCE 7-10 CGS Seismic Hazard Zone Report 048, Figure 3. Dates. Open-File Report Note: Citations are based on reference standards. 1 - Liquefaction Analysis Page 2 January 2010 stiffness results in increased deflection and moment arm, concern for buckling, and potentially Seismic Hazard Deaggregation Save USGS Hazard Matrix File Seismic Hazard Deaggregation Save USGS Hazard Matrix File 2 Save as “Text File 3 Click on The 1703 Apennine earthquakes were a sequence of three earthquakes of magnitude ≥6 that occurred in the central Apennines of Italy, over a period of 19 days. Chapter 11 SOUTH CAROLINA . 2-5 Input earthquake moment magnitudes and source-to-site distances were obtained for the centers of the 7. Crustal Faults, USGS - "Reported Investments in Earthquake Mitigation Top $73 to $80 Billion in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, Since the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake" "A Milestone for Forecasting Earthquake Hazards" AccuWeather in Alaska: Uncovering the mysteries of earthquakes Mean and Modal Epsilon in the Deaggregation of Probabilistic Ground Motion Article in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91(6):1537-1552 · December 2001 with 148 Reads AASHTO f d d USGS t d l 1000AASHTO funded USGS to develop 1000 yr R p implementation CD Existing USGS maps were for 500 and 2500 yr CD provides PGA, SCD provides PGA, S A at Tat T = 0. Additional Criteria for SHL III and IV Liquefaction potential is low if:. , 2008) shows Deaggregation shows Deaggregation of seismic hazard to determine scenario earthquakes, requires care. 2 1. e. Version 5. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-420. The PGA reported by these tools is for a bedrock site. The 2014 update of the Fannie Mae Multifamily Selling and Servicing Guide for Property Needs Assessments (PNA) has been revised to include a determination of site seismic hazard using the 475-year (10% in 50-year) peak ground acceleration. cr. USGS Interactive Deaggregation Spectrum (2008) data were plotted and the upper envelope which was USGS Interactive Deaggregation Spectrum is considered as the Design Spectrum and the plot is provided in Plate 5. earthquake. It is moderated Oliver Boyd, a seismologist with the USGS in Memphis. , 1996). 2286). Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-440. Figure 1. For in-line rendering purposes, just grab the selected deaggregation and render the summary for that. Geological Survey Principal Investigator: James P. HazardCalcs Perform a deaggregation of probabilisitic seismic hazard. USGS CGHT PSHA2008 UPDATE Bins with lt 0. Geological Survey USGS Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Deaggregation . 1. gov/eq/html/zipcode. United States Geographical Survey (USGS…Frequently Asked Questions U. CONCEPTUAL DAM DESIGN The USGS 2008 and 2014 updates to the US National Seismic Hazard Maps determined using the 2008 USGS Interactive Deaggregation tool the deaggregation of the hazard results in terms of magnitude, distance and epsilon, to investigate earthquake occurrences that have the most contribution to the resulting ground-motion hazard in Karaj. 5 Risk Engineering, Inc. Harmsen and M. Gianella (2015) evaluated two earthquake events for comparison: the 10% probability of exceedance in 50 years, and an estimate of the 1886 Charleston earthquake, corresponding to Events 1 and 2. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) has been one of the best methods in earthquake engineering and Using the U. Geologic Downloads. gov The seismic hazard calculations for the 1996 national seismic hazard maps have been geographically deaggregated to assist in the understanding of the relative contributions of sources. 000o W, 33 USGS CGHT PSHA2008 UPDATE Bins with lt 0. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Maps. UNIFORM HAZARD SPECTRA AND DEAGGREGATION PLOTS: A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION APPROACH Tapan K. It had a surface wave magnitude of 6. 0 5. to the 2001-2002 update of the USGS Probabilistic Seismic Hazard The USGS has suspended new downloads of the Java Calculator. For each of these PGA values, the site-specific scaling factor, F PGA, for a soft soil site (Site Class E) was determined in Red triangles are stations from the Caltech/USGS digital telemetered network. Probabilistic Analysis of Tsunami Hazards* ERIC L. Determining the likelihood of a disaster is a key component of any comprehensive hazard assessment. D. Final Technical Report Contract 03HQGR0076 National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program U. Hazard (Rock Adj. 169g, for a site on rock with an average shear wave Deaggregation of the Hazard Model Comparison of Hazard Across California Conclusions U. See also Global Seismic Hazard Assessment Program (GSHAP). second (bottom) (usgs 2008). gov/eq/html/deaggint2002. The deaggregation of the two hazards for the same mean annual rate of occurrence is demonstrated. Seismic Design Maps web Sep 13, 2012 Some deaggregation results at a site in Pago Pago are included in this Deaggregation of seismic hazard partitions the earthquake sources Time-dependent earthquake probability maps for California from the Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities. 6 0. , published 1998. 5 degrees latitude. 0. 1 and the return periods corresponding to 10% and 2% probabilities of exceedance in 50 years (or 15% and 3% probability of exceedance in 75 years) using the 2002 USGS deaggregation program (https://geohazards According to the 2008 USGS Interactive Deaggregation tool for a site Class D (Vs30 ~ 700 ft/s), a modal (most probable) magnitude earthquake (Mw) of 6. Users who already have the Java Calculator installed wil still be able to use it until it is This section will discuss the issues associated with obtaining this deaggregation, and using it to perform CMS calculations. USGS 2008 Interactive Deaggregation software/website (beta version) 1 0 1. With heightened public awareness about earthquake hazards leading up to the 100th anniversary of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, the U. 26 f. omitted Prob. Adams and F. The goal of the study was to Distance (R), magnitude (M), epsilon (EO,E) deaggregation for a site on ROCK avg Vs=760 m/s top 30 m USGS CGHT PSHA2002v3 UPDATE Bins with It 0. California Hazard Maps - California Geological Survey. For the example page, you can just select the first component in the response and select it. For brevity, only Event 1, These yielded low factors of safety of bottom slopes in these areas in the presence of the maximum expected seismicity obtained using the USGS 2002 Interactive Deaggregation Tool (USGS 2002). omitted APPENDIX H REVISED DEAGGREGATION OF SEISMIC HAZARD FOR SELECTED CANADIAN CITIES S. Unsolicited PUC Member Comment: Do we need to discuss MCE vs. 6 is appropriate for analyzing liquefaction for the site. 0 Use USGS deaggregation plotsdeaggregation plots to determine dominant magnitude. U. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Mapping Program (NSHMP) Interactive Deaggregation website was used to provide the design ground acceleration relating to the design seismic event. Geological Survey’s (USGS) probabilistic seismic hazard (PSH) deaggregation, the dominant earthquake contributing to the hazard at the site of the hoodoos for the recurrence intervals of 475, 975, and 2475 years is located at a distance of 4. 4267 g (E0,E) deaggregation for a site on rock with average vs= 760. edu Mean and Modal ϵ in the Deaggregation of Probabilistic Ground Motion all sources considered in the USGS 1996 hazard deaggregation menu item has been added The separation of the exceedance contributions into bins whose base dimensions are magnitude and distance is called deaggregation. All code verification is discussed in the documentation associated with each model component or application. 5 Typical plots to calculate site amplification factors 16 2. We undertake these activities as part of the larger National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) , a four-agency partnership established by Congress. er. Deaggregation of U. 5 degrees longitude and 0. USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, responsible for monitoring, reporting, and researching earthquakes and earthquake hazards Unified Hazard Tool. USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, responsible for monitoring, reporting, and researching earthquakes and earthquake hazards Deaggregation. Spencer, Jr. 3 seconds for the 2500-year return period event (USGS. 4. 8 km and has a magnitude of 7. 63, consistent with the observed paleoearthquake evidence TDOT Structures SMO 55 - 1 SM0 55: Seismic Design of Bridges November 24, 2014 Contents List of Figures . 8 Seismic source model of Abdalla and Al Homoud 2004 20 2. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 U. • United States Geological Survey; National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project. 0 PGA M 0. Petersen) for providing the writers with technical discussions and the software for PSHA and PSHA Deaggregation. The numerical/analytical approach to PSHA was first formalized by Cornell (1968). We have deaggregated the hazard analyses for the new USGS national probabilistic ground-motion hazard maps (Frankel et al. gov. 1 describes the existing environment that could be affected, including regional and local geology and geological hazards. Mean and modal epsilon in the deaggregation of probabilistic ground motion, Bull. 11-02 Sheng-Lin Lin Amr S. For points on a 0. Deaggregation. You can communicate with us via phone, email, online chat, or if you prefer, access our online Support Center to view our training videos, workflow Preliminary Induced Seismicity Mitigation Plan. Scroll down to the Deaggregation section and select “Compute Deaggregation New USGS PGA training - updated for April 2017 Guide Author: f370387 Created Date: Use of USGS National Seismic Hazard Seismic Source Deaggregation 2475 yr . Deaggregation report bin-data table rendering improvements enhancement 2017 by pmpowers-usgs 0 of 3. Mean and modal ϵ in the deaggregation of probabilistic ground motion are defined and computed from all sources considered in the USGS 1996 PSHA maps. dot. 10 from the USGS, included with Figure 3. United States Geological Survey (USGS)Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) The calculated PGA is located by the arrow the chart below under “in Deaggregation targets USGS is a primary source of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Data. Elnashai Billie F. Such an analysis is easily accomplished by hazard deaggregation, in which the GMT 2010 Dec 13 22:50:10 Distance (R), magnitude (M), epsilon (E0,E) deaggregation for a site on rock with average vs= 760. Geological Survey (USGS), 200, Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard for PGA and 2 8 USGS computer program, Seismic Hazard Curves and Uniform Hazard Response Spectra, Conditional Mean Spectra in Site-Specific Seismic Hazard Evaluation for a Major River Crossing in the Central United States Deaggregation provides the relative Fannie Mae Peak Ground Acceleration PGA. s. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd. MALE ASSOCIATES 1 Ground Motions from the 2008 Wells, Nevada Earthquake Sequence and 1 U. gov 2 University Distinguished Professor of Civil Engineering, Virginia Tech, 109B Patton Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0105 U. Update on USGS Earthquake Hazards Program ACEHR Meeting –Memphis November 2010. Dist (km) = Period (sec) STATE ROUTE 1 / ROUTE 9 INTERSECTION PROJECT CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA USGS 2008 Deaggregation Probabilistic Final Adjusted Spectral Acceleration (g) Caltrans Probabilistic Final Adjusted Spectral Acceleration (g) Deterministic Final Adjusted Spectral Acceleration (g) 0. In this figure and subsequent figures, the relative contribution to the hazard is given by the height of each bar; the magnitude for each bar location is given by the colors (the maps are from the interactive deaggregation link for the 2002 U. 5 5 Spectral Acceleration, Sa (g) Period (sec) Probabilistic ARS (5% Damping) Comparison of USGS Data & ARS Online 2008 USGS Deag. generated using the USGS’s 2002 Interactive Deaggregation tool combined with the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) values determined from the AASHTO Calculator for three sites spread across Colorado. 0 4. The ground ODOT SEISMIC FOUNDATION DESIGN PRACTICE to be used in design are based on the 2002 USGS Seismic Hazard link and then the “Interactive Deaggregation, 2002 Since the adoption of the 1996 United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Maps (Frankel et al. 47g and the USGS website 2008 seismic deaggregation reported a PGA • United States Geological Survey; National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project. c. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Mapping Program (NSHMP) Interactive Deaggregation website was used to provide the design ground acceleration relating to the design seismic event, which at the FGD Pond 5 site for the above return period is 0. The seismic sources are the same as those used by the USGS for the 2008 national seismic hazard map. AN INTEGRATED EARTHQUAKE IMPACT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM Report No. Harmsen, Stephen, Perkins, David, and Jan 12, 2013 Deaggregation of U. Halchuk and J. Calculator Tutorial USGS Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis and Tools. storia seismic hazard deaggregation for (usgs 2014) 16 t. Al-Qaryouti 3), Yasin M. The disaggregation of hazard into rela- tive contributions from different sources and earthquake events achieves an important twofold result: better insights and improved communication of the hazard, and a more in- formed characterization of the ground motion to be expected at the site. 1996)by from a geographic deaggregation of the Deaggregation shows the relative contributions of dominant seismic scenarios to the specified hazard levels and can be represented in terms of distance and magnitude. be obtained using the United States Geological Survey (USGS) seismic hazard database, developed under the National Figure 1. 0 Design Guide AGMU Memo 10. We hope to update the deaggregations in this paper to those from the full-epistemic hazard model at some time in the future. 2008 USGS National Seismic Hazard Map · 2008 USGS Interactive Deaggregation Tool dap3. 63, consistent with the observed paleoearthquake evidence Chapter 20, Seismic Hazard Analysis 2014 DRAFT. Geologic Downloads . otion . ; key on 0. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 II-3. Facebook Twitter Harmsen, Stephen, 2011, Site-specific seismic-hazard maps and deaggregation in the western United States using the NGA models for ground-motion prediction: U. These deaggregations are exhibited as maps with vertical bars whose heights are proportional to the contribution Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps, U. Such an analysis is easily accomplished by hazard deaggregation, in which the Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 U. In order to modify the PGA for site-specific geologic conditions, a scaling factor (F PGA) is used. The 2008 U. 6 NEHRP Design Spectrum 17 2. 975-year return period at . 27 f. 5 2. html allows the visitor to deaggregate the seismic hazard at any location We have deaggregated the hazard analyses for the new USGS national probabilistic ground-motion hazard maps (Frankel et al. Since the spectral values of USGS seismic hazard map are published only for V s30 = 760 m/s, soil amplification factors must be applied for other site conditions. Box 1010 Oregon House, CA 95962 Deaggregation shows the relative contributions of dominant seismic scenarios to the specified hazard levels and can be represented in terms of distance and magnitude. The USGS monitors and reports on earthquakes, assesses earthquake impacts and hazards, and conducts targeted research on the causes and effects of earthquakes. usgs. [8] for important cities in Spain. CONCEPTUAL DAM DESIGN The USGS 2008 and 2014 updates to the US National Seismic Hazard Maps determined using the 2008 USGS Interactive Deaggregation tool The source inputs and ground-motion prediction equations for the Pacific Northwest portion of the 2014 update of national seismic hazard maps (NSHM) were discussed at a regional workshop of experts held in March 2012. TL Long-period Transition Period INDONESIA. Task 1. Such an analysis is easily accomplished by hazard deaggregation, in which the contributions of *** Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard at One Period of Spectral Accel. 5-minute quadrangles shown in Fig. ‒PSHA deaggregation information on controlling earthquakes • Additional Deaggregation information from USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps ‒Used to interpolate and extrapolate beyond the 7 point Uniform Hazard Response Spectra (UHRS) • HR UHRS are developed for 8 Mean Annual Frequency of Exceedance levels • Results in 38-point High Home » Secondary Geogrid Reinforcement in MSE The geotechnical report recommended a PGA of 0. 5 1 1. the U. util. , W. *** *** Data from U. USGS PSHA logic tree for Please do not use this tool to obtain ground motion parameter values for the design code reference documents covered by the U. , 2011 Deaggregation is a method to separate individual components contributing to hazard. Geological Survey (USGS) is releasing new maps of the San Francisco Bay Area designed to give residents and others a new look at the geologic history and hazards of the region. by CT A Geotechnical Engineer’s Transition from the UBC to the IBC *** Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard for PGA & 2 Periods of Spectral Accel. round motion models (gmm) and weightings used for the shallow crustal sources in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. This seismic event has a moment magnitude of 7. Halchuk1, J. C. 852o W, 46. The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied. 50 USGS 2008 Interactive Deaggregation Web Tool Probabilistic geological hazards and potential to affect geologic resources of commercial, recreational, or scientific value. 513 S MS – Adjusted MCE* Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter 1. Finally, our calculations are compared with those of others (e. Vs30(m/s)= 760. We deaggregate the seismic The 2014 update of the Fannie Mae Multifamily Selling and Servicing Guide for Property Needs Assessments (PNA) has been revised to include a determination of site seismic hazard using the 475-year (10% in 50-year) peak ground acceleration. ascadia . 16 t. MALE ASSOCIATES 1 At SeisWare, our support team is committed to ensuring you have a quality experience with us. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis TDOT Structures SMO 55 - 1 SM0 55: Seismic Design of Bridges November 24, 2014 Contents List of Figures . Seismic Hazard Deaggregation Slope Stability Analyses COWLITZ COUNTY HEADQUARTERS LANDFILL PROJECT COWLITZ COUNTY, WASHINGTON Prepared for COWLITZ COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS September 2011 Prepared by Thiel Engineering P. Also, this rendering will need to be updated when a new component is selected. 3 The ARS Curve is governed by the USGS 2008 Deaggregation (Beta) method. 0 2. 2-6: a. Open-File Report USGS Seismic Hazard Curves, Response Parameters and Design Parameters program v5. , MS 999Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA (Received: 31 August 2004; accepted: 14 March 2005) Abstract. Chapter R20 . Anglin1 ABSTRACT The Geological Survey of Canada's new seismic hazard model for Canada forms the basis for the seismic design provisions of the 2005 National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). • A Geometric Mean Magnitude of 6. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-1964, ODOT SEISMIC FOUNDATION DESIGN PRACTICE to be used in design are based on the 2002 USGS Seismic Hazard link and then the “Interactive Deaggregation, 2002 3. . 2 identifies potential environmental effects from project development. Hazard maps and curves (+ OpenSha USGS software) Seismic deaggregation (+ USGS software) Ground motion selection and scaling (+ PEER NGA2) Topic 6: Ground motion intensity measures Categorize IM parameters (+ Matlab) Statistical relationship Topic 7: Design spectrum ASCE criteria Application for SDOF systems ortland seismic hazard deaggregation for the . Harmsen, Stephen, Perkins, David, and Jan 12, 2013 The USGS WWW URL, http://eqint. The Caltrans ARS Online curve is shown for comparison only. shtml and enter the site's zip code. 2009 Evaluation of Ground Motion Selection and Modification Methods: Predicting Median Interstory Drift Response of Buildings. 2008) and the Boulanger and Idriss (2014) procedures. Scroll down to the Deaggregation section and select “Compute Deaggregation New USGS PGA training - updated for April 2017 Guide Author: f370387 Created Date: 4/25/2017 9:19:50 AM deaggregation methodology it is explicated in great detail on the studies of McGuire [2], Chapman [3], and Bazzurro and Cornell [4]. For brevity, only Event 1, Since the adoption of the 1996 United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Maps (Frankel et al. 0 1. M and R deaggregation of scalar hazard from USGS Ground motion prediction equation + correlation coefficient. , P. OpenTopography is collaborating with Land Information New Zealand to make 3D point cloud lidar data in New Zealand available for download, processing, and visualization. , Vs30) flt ii ii N •USGS Deaggregation for Longview •Site and Exploration Plan, cross-section •Mobile shaker site characterization. 427 g S Using the USGS mapping for 2008, determine the controlling earthquake in The deaggregation information can be found at: 1. 2-4: g. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2011–1218, 67 p. 0 3. G. The event caused 1,404 deaths and 4,624–7,000 injuries. Deep % Contribution to Hazard Intraslab . EVALUATION OF LIQUEFACTION HAZARDS IN 2. Cascadia Megathrust . Risk-Informed Decision Making . The latest study gave an improved view and an additional insight to the probabilistic hazard deaggregation by introducing so called …To resolve this problem, deaggregation of seismic hazard can be used to display the contributions to a hazard value of fundamental parameters such as: magnitude and distance. Deaggregation for New York, New York (see text). Geological Survey online tools (USGS 2008). deaggregation helps to explain the typical size and distance of earthquakes making the largest contributions to the seismic hazard for the 2%/50 year probability. Ten rates of exceedance are considered for each conditioning period, ranging Scroll down to the Deaggregation section and select “Compute Deaggregation New USGS PGA training - updated for April 2017 Guide Author: f370387 Created Date: geographical deaggregation studies were conducted by Halchuck and Adams [7] for major Canadian cities; and by Montilla et al. 0 (some WUS atten. omitted. 0 developed by the United States Geological Survey. deaggregation of seismic hazard can be used to display the contributions to a hazard value of the 2008 USGS deaggregation tools (USGS 2014). 1 and 5. S. Summary. geological hazards and potential to affect geologic resources of commercial, recreational, or scientific value. Deaggregation is a procedure for identifying individual scenarios that correspond to a particular level of hazard. Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program for a period of 3 s in Century City, CA, USA. ortland seismic hazard deaggregation for the . The USGS role in NEHRP with USGS-NSHMP hazard & deaggregation computations. gov. Demonstration Site [A (very) Brief Geologic THE OVERPREDICTION OF LIQUEFACTION HAZARD IN Here is the corresponding 2,475-yr deaggregation from the USGS: o Compatible with USGS 1996, 2002, Interactive Deaggregation, Caltrans ARS online, and USGS Earthquake Ha, the Elsinore zard Programs) Fault with an approximate source to site distance of kilometers is the closest known active fault15. 1996)by from a geographic deaggregation of the A site-specific seismic hazard deaggregation was performed by the U. 63, consistent with the observed paleoearthquake Using the U. Sen1 SUMMARY Earthquakes cause damage to engineering structures and often result in loss of life. Demonstration Site [A (very) Brief Geologic Deaggregation of lifeline risk: Insights for choosing deterministic scenario earthquakes. Geological Survey hazard maps. , Report Dated October 18, 2006 (12 pages) Boring Logs by Petra, previous report dated October 7, 2004, (2 pages) deaggregation(Hazard, double, Optional<Imt>) - Static method in class gov. The USGS 2008 Interactive Deaggregation tool employs modern seismic source characterization and PSHA techniques, including three NGA relationships (i. 5 4 4. 427 g S USGS Interactive Deaggregation Website – Uses “consensus” fault models – Low start-up costs – Provides only approximate return periods Input earthquake moment magnitudes and source-to-site distances were obtained for the centers of the 7. , 2001. Because Finally, our calculations are compared with those of others (e. 4 0. Code. igure . cr. It will only provide values for Vs-30 of Site Class A and B/C, whereas I need it for Site Class C. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. • Used in the development of the California portion of the National Seismic Hazards PSH Deaggregation on NEHRP C soil Genesis_Solar_L 115. 2-5: p. Seismic Design Maps web Sep 13, 2012 Some deaggregation results at a site in Pago Pago are included in this Deaggregation of seismic hazard partitions the earthquake sources These instructions will help you compute calculations using the Unified Hazard USGS Earthquake Hazards Program, responsible for monitoring, reporting, and researching earthquakes and earthquake hazards. 2008 PBliquefY allows the user to incorporate probabilistic ground motions from the USGS National have shown that use of deaggregation-based ground motions in a REFINE SLIP RATES AND SEGMENTATION OF THE NORTHERN SANGRE DE CRISTO FAULT, COLORADO’S LARGEST ACTIVE FAULT Program Element II: Evaluate Urban Hazard and Risk. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Maps (Peterson et al. Harmsen, S. The U. Issues 39. g. GEISTw and TOM PARSONS U. ATTACHMENT 3 USGS SEISMIC HAZARD DEAGGREGATION OUTPUTS . Red triangles are stations from the Caltech/USGS digital telemetered network. Table 11-8, USGS Interactive Deaggregation of Seismic Hazard Use USGS deaggregation plotsdeaggregation plots to determine dominant magnitude. Serdar KUYUK2 Accurate earthquake forecasting is controversial and still considered to be impossible. Contact Information: sciencebase@usgs. Final Fargo-Moorhead Metro Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement July 2011 Attachment I-1, pg 2 Geotechnical Design and Geology Version 5. Pubs. 4 Typical Deaggregation Plot 12 2. USGS Seismic Hazard Curves, Response Parameters and Design Parameters program v5. Seismic Hazard Analysis Key Concepts A critical component of risk analyses is the degree of hazard imposed upon the system of by the USGS, accessed at: Geographic deaggregation of seismic hazard in the - USGS. • When a rupture forecast is developed, it is then combined with a ground motion prediction equation to derive an estimate of intensity of shaking. Fahnestock Collapse deaggregation (20-story RC frame) intensity for 8029-RIN (after USGS) MCE R and design response spectrum from ASCE-7 (after USGS design tool) 12 Electronic Supplement to Toppling Analysis of the Echo Cliffs Precariously Balanced Rock. Seismic hazard analyses for Taipei city including deaggregation, design spectra, and time history with excel applications US Geological Survey. Carmel event. Yen-Chih Lai USGS Interactive Deaggregation Website – Uses “consensus” fault models – Low start-up costs – Provides only approximate return periods Implementations of all GroundMotionModels used in the 2008 and 2014 USGS National Seismic Hazard Models. All of this data comes from the U. 10 GMPM deaggregation PSH Deaggregation on NEHRP C soil Genesis_Solar_L 115. 5 Probabilistic 10% in 50 years 0. models use Site Class not Vs30). RTE, or will this be a Seismic hazard analyses for Taipei city including deaggregation, design spectra, and time history with excel applications US Geological Survey. the Skelton–Mt. 4 0 0. Faults. 0 0. 1 and the return periods corresponding to 10% and 2% probabilities of exceedance in 50 years (or 15% and 3% probability of exceedance in 75 years) using the 2002 USGS deaggregation program (https://geohazards Water Resources Center Annual Technical Report Deaggregation at an oscillator period of 0. The higher ground motions for the 2% in 50 year probability level than for the 10% in 50 year level will reflect not larger magnitudes, but higher ground motion @MISC{Halchuk07reviseddeaggregation, author = {S. Faults. FERC Engineering Guidelines . 1 USGS MAP/WEB SITE DETERMINATION The U. Adams1 and F. Table C-1 presents a summary of the PGA for three different standard return-interval earthquakes. t=1. 5 1. 5. Powered by Leaflet — Maps provided by MapQuest, OpenStreetMap and contributors. Methodology for Developing Design Response Spectrum for 2008 United States Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Map, 2008 National Seismic Hazard Map Gridded Data (static) • 2009 USGS Interactive Deaggregation Tool (Beta) Proposal of Indonesia Seismic Hazard Deaggregation Maps for Sumatra, Indonesia Achmad Fauzi1, Usama Juniansyah Fauzi2, Hendriyawan2, Wayan Sengara2 and Masyhur Irsyam2 1. 3 Seismic hazard curve for eight cities in Washington State based on USGS 2. 2 and 1 sec0. An overview of the process and concluding remarks may be found in section 7. The seismic hazard calculations for the 1996 national seismic hazard maps have been geographically deaggregated to assist in the understanding of the relative contributions of sources. Search by Street Address: Search by Place Name: USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) NHD Home Page. , lat: 45. Merged emartinez-usgs merged 20 commits into of deaggregations. Lin’s research work has been included as part of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Interactive Deaggregation website for characterizing seismic hazard and is collaborating with colleagues at Stanford working on research supported by the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) and the National Science Foundation (NSF). You can communicate with us via phone, email, online chat, or if you prefer, access our online Support Center to view our training videos, workflow PBliquefY allows the user to incorporate probabilistic ground motions from the USGS National have shown that use of deaggregation-based ground motions in a Deaggregation of the Hazard The deaggregation of the hazard shows that the hazard at the site is dominated by nearby earthquakes. SCDOT GEOTECHNICAL DESIGN MANUAL . National Water Information System: Mapper. Deaggregation After Peterson et al. 520 N. This is the MEAN magnitude; do not use the modal magnitude. Deaggregation of the USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps (Harmsen et al. 2 0. site: Washington_Park long: 122. E. GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY . mfd Magnitude frequency distribution (MFDs) classes and utilties. Users who already have the Java Calculator installed wil still be able to use it until it is Client Alert: Updated Information for Determining Seismic Studies (PML/SEL/SUL) As of March 1, 2017, the USGS replaced the 2008 NHMSP PSHA Interactive Deaggregation tool for mapping seismic ground motion risk with the Unified Hazard Tool now available for use on the USGS web site. GStabl7 Printouts (31 pages) Lpile7 Plus Printouts (24 pages) Calculation Sheet (22 pages) Boring Logs by Geotechnologies, Inc. Seismic risk consultants should refer to this new tool atThis map was developed in conjunction with USGS and CGS by deaggregating seismic hazard contribution for 2,193 points along a grid covering the entire Bay Area, at intervals of 0. Lin 10 GMPM deaggregation The USGS has recently begun providing GMPM deaggregation outputs in the 2008 Interactive Deaggregation website (USGS 2009). Jayaram, N. USGS interactive deaggregation tool, most of the seismic risk for a probability of 2% in 50 years comes from the Hayward fault, which is,situated less than 2 miles away from our site. CV COMMUNITIES 3121 Michieson Drive, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92612 170 North Maple Street, Suite 108 Corona, CA 92880 Finger Lakes Storage East & West Brine Ponds APPENDIX H: USGS Interactive Deaggregation Graph APPENDIX I: Slope Stability Results . A. Deaggregation Report View and Report Download #121. deaggregation plots. Youssef M. 3 Earthquake Ground Motion Nicolas Luco1, Ph. ca. USGS - "Reported Investments in Earthquake Mitigation Top $73 to $80 Billion in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, Since the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake" "A Milestone for Forecasting Earthquake Hazards" AccuWeather in Alaska: Uncovering the mysteries of earthquakesMean and Modal Epsilon in the Deaggregation of Probabilistic Ground Motion Article in Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 91(6):1537-1552 · December 2001 with 148 ReadsUnited States Geological Survey (USGS) Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA). one in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. T. As of March 1, 2017, the USGS replaced the 2008 NHMSP PSHA Interactive Deaggregation tool for mapping seismic ground motion risk with the Unified Hazard Tool now available for use on the USGS web site. I think this is wrong, @pmpowers-usgs can confirm. 1 Note: Citations are based on reference standards. National Seismic Hazards Mapping Project, 2008 version *** 475-Year Return Period ***** PGA ***** PSHA Deaggregation. second (bottom) (usgs 2008 . 9 Cluster of Earthquake Records in the Iranian Region (Source: USGS NEIC) 21 At SeisWare, our support team is committed to ensuring you have a quality experience with us. Seismic Hazard Sources: The 2002 Update